Regulation & Legal

MGA narrows foreign license recognition reforms

The Malta Gaming Authority has scaled back several proposed requirements for companies operating in or from Malta under recognized foreign gaming licenses. The regulator confirmed on October 29 that consultation feedback had prompted revisions to its Recognition Notice framework, describing the revised approach as proportionate, risk-based, and practical for certificate holders.

Recognition Notices allow qualifying authorizations from other EU or European Economic Area countries, and jurisdictions accepted as offering largely equivalent safeguards, to have the same effect as an MGA authorization for gaming services or supplies in or from Malta. The certificates cover both consumer-facing operators and business-to-business suppliers and require annual maintenance reviews.

The detailed revisions appear in a feedback statement dated October 26 and circulated to notice holders and their representatives. According to NEXT.io’s exclusive reporting on the statement, the MGA dropped a standardized legal opinion template. It will instead specify the confirmations that opinions must address, accommodating differences between foreign legal systems.

Other requirements were narrowed following objections about duplication and commercial sensitivity. Ultimate beneficial ownership information will replace a proposed full corporate structure chart, while disclosure of regulatory history will focus on material fitness and licensing matters rather than five years of correspondence. Deposit information appears set to use predefined bands, with payment methods grouped into categories.

B2B suppliers will be exempt from many of the proposed obligations, reflecting the distinction between their activities and those of consumer-facing businesses. The MGA’s public announcement confirmed that stakeholder submissions informed its revisions, although it did not publish the detailed feedback statement or enumerate the changes on its website.

Risk assessment identifies weaknesses in foreign-license oversight

The consultation followed concerns documented in Malta’s 2023 National Risk Assessment. That assessment assigned the Recognition Notice framework a medium-high residual money-laundering risk rating, compared with medium ratings for remote and land-based gaming. The classification concerns risks associated with the framework; it is not a finding that individual certificate holders engaged in money laundering. ncc.gov.mt

The assessment identified reliance on businesses notifying the MGA that they operate under foreign licenses as a vulnerability. It also highlighted the possibility that recognized businesses could be subject to less robust anti-money-laundering controls or supervision in the licensing jurisdiction. An official presentation explaining the assessment’s findings similarly identified operator notification and reliance on foreign regulators as central weaknesses.

Existing MGA application requirements already include a certified foreign gaming license, a letter of good standing from the issuing authority, and a professional legal opinion. That opinion must address matters including territorial scope, regulatory compliance checks, and comparability with services licensable under Maltese law. Consumer-facing applicants must also provide confirmations concerning applicable anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing obligations.

In its April 29 consultation announcement, the MGA said the proposed enhancements followed an internal review and were aligned with Malta’s National Risk Assessment and National AML/CFT Strategy 2024–2026. Their stated objectives were stronger assessments when recognition is granted and more structured ongoing monitoring. The October announcement confirmed completion of the authority’s review of stakeholder responses.

NEXT.io reported that initial data collection was planned for 2026, covering the 2025 reporting period and limited to B2C operators. Some requirements may need amendments to the existing framework. The MGA has not publicly specified a complete implementation timetable, stating: “The Authority will share further information on the practical application of specific requirements in due course

More to Explore

Back to top button